Monday, October 8, 2012

Debate


As intriguing as Obama and Romney were in the presidential debate held in Denver, Romney was more successful at accomplishing victory within the debate.  The parts that were most interesting where those where Romney would successfully satisfy a question, where as Obama would go around the question by using strategies such as, explaining was the question entails or what would happen if we continue to go on using the same resources. In this debate, Obama failed to represent his plans by failing to back them up with explanations. People would argue that Romney was to forceful in getting his points across, and that he didn’t follow proper guidelines for a professional debate. However, I felt that Romney used this technique to show that he was the most qualified candidate. The strategy mad him seem like that candidate who was more familiar with society and one that is more positive that his plans would work if we elected him. I do agree that Romney should have considered the timing of his agreements more, however, I feel like this would of just contributed more time for Obama to not answer the questions he was asked. Also, Obama would continue trying to rebuttal Romney by brings up acquisitions about his plans. Once Romney refuted these arguments and said they were false, Obama continued trying to use them. Romney was outstanding during the debate, while Obama seemed a little uncomfortable to me.

No comments:

Post a Comment